Moot Court Competition Teams
Western New England University School of Law offers numerous opportunities for students to hone their professional lawyering skills through legal competitions. Through various inter-law school and intramural moot court teams students have ample opportunity to add valuable experiences to their law school education.
TEAMS FROM WESTERN NEW ENGLAND HAVE DISTINGUISHED THEMSELVES IN REGIONAL AND NATIONAL COMPETITIONS
Recent Competition Highlights
NEGOTIATION TEAM PLACES THIRD IN 2017-2018 NATIONAL ABA NEGOTIATION COMPETITION
The Western New England School of Law Negotiation Team placed third in the ABA National Negotiation Competition after spending 8 days competing against 13 other teams. The Western New England team included law students Thomas Holman of Middletown CT, and Joseph Masse of Wakefield RI. The team was assisted by former team member Matthew Minniefield, who now works as a law clerk at the New York Court of Appeals. Law Professor Rene Reich-Graefe, who coached and mentored the negotiation team, was thrilled with the outstanding performance of law students representing the Western New England University.
Transactional Law Meet Team Places Second in 2017-2018 Regional Meet
The Western New England University School of Law Transactional Law Meet team finished second (behind the team from Northwestern University Law School) at the regional meet held on Friday, February 23 at Widener Commonwealth Law School in Harrisburg, PA. The team members included Joseph Masse (3L), Heather Merrill (4L), and Karen Tiroletto Santiago (4L). In the competition they represented the sellers of a high-tech firm that was being purchased by a sovereign wealth fund from China. The facets of the competition included: interviewing their client, drafting an agreement, marking up the other side's document and, ultimately, negotiating a deal. Dean Eric Gouvin served as faculty advisor and former team member Attorney Kelvin Thomas (JD/MBA '14) from the Hartford firm of Ford & Paulekas, did much of the coaching. Additional help was provided by faculty members Rene Reich-Graefe and Robert Statchen, along with attorneys Daniel McKellick ('14) of Bacon Wilson and David Parke of Bulkley, Richardson and Gelinas.
Semifinalists, National ABA Negotiation Competition, 2016-2017
Finalist, Regional ABA Negotiation Competition, 2016-2017
Semifinalists, National ABA Negotiation Competition, 2015-2016
Regional Semifinalist, Transactional Lawyering Meet, 2015-2016
Regional Semifinalist, Transactional Lawyering Meet, 2014-2015
Finalist, Regional ABA Negotiation Competition, 2014-2015
Quarterfinalists, Jeffrey G. Miller Pace National Environmental Law Moot Court Competition, 20147-2015
Regional Semifinalist, Transactional Lawyering Meet, 2013-2014
Regional Champion, Transactional Lawyering Meet, 2012-2013
Finalist, Regional ABA Negotiation Competition, 2012-2013
Quarterfinalists, Northeast Region, National Moot Court Competition, 2012-2013
Second Place, ABA Law Student Tax Challenge, 2011-2012
National Champion, Transactional Lawyering Meet, 2010-2011
Quarterfinalists, First Amendment Moot Court Competition, 2010- 2011
Best Brief (Petitioner), Rendigs National Products Liability Moot Court Competition, 2010-2011
Best Oralist, Rendigs National Products Liability Moot Court Competition, 2010-2011
First Place, ABA Law Student Tax Challenge, 2008-2009
Quarterfinalists, First Amendment Moot Court Competition, 2008-2009
Best Written Submission, ABA Law Student Tax Challenge, 2008-2009
First Place, Rendigs National Products Liability Moot Court Competition, 2008-2009
Finalist (Team 1), Regional ABA Negotiation Competition, 2008-2009
Finalist (Team 2), Regional ABA Negotiation Competition, 2008-2009
Finalist, Regional ABA Negotiation Competition, 2007-2008
Semifinalist, National ABA Negotiation Competition, 2007-2008
First Place, ABA Law Student Tax Challenge, 2006-2007
Best Brief, Frederick Douglass National Moot Court, 2006-2007
Finalist, Regional ABA Negotiation Competition, 2006-2007
Moot Court Teams
Our Moot Court Teams
Students try out for moot court teams in order to perfect their research, writing, and oral advocacy skills and gain confidence and experience presenting a case in court. This valuable educational experience offers excellent preparation for stepping into a career. Team members fine-tune research, writing, and oral advocacy skills; learn to work as a team; and perform under pressure.
“Negotiation team was one of the most enjoyable and meaningful experiences I had in law school. As both a competitor and student coach on the team, I developed valuable practical lawyering skills that I will carry with me into real world practice. I really enjoyed the collaborative and collegial atmosphere created by the coaches and competitors at practice. Above all, we were a team, and each of us was dedicated to ensuring the success of our teammates.” – Sandra San Emeterio
AAJ Trial Team
The Western New England University School of Law Trial Team holds tryouts early in the fall semester. Four students are chosen for one competing team that enters the American Association for Justice (AAJ) Trial Competition. There is no writing component to the competition. Tryouts and the competition consist of mock jury trials, including opening statements, direct and cross examinations of witnesses, and closing arguments. More information about the Student Advocacy Trial Competition can be found on the American Association for Justice website.
Coach: Tina Cafaro - Professor Cafaro is an Assistant District Attorney in the Hampden County District Attorney’s Office and is the supervising professor for the Criminal Law Clinic at the School of Law. She teaches at the New England Regional Building Trial Skills program. In addition, she lectures for the Massachusetts Criminal Justice Training Council teaching criminal law and procedure.
To Qualify: Must be a full-time 2L or part-time 3L.
Commitment: Two years – the first year you will assist the team in preparing for the competition; the second year you will select the new members and compete in the competition
Course Credit: First year you will receive 2 credits in the spring semester which satisfies 2 experiential learning credits. Second year, as a competing member, you will receive 1 credit in the fall semester and 2 credits in the spring semester which satisfies 3 experiential learning credits.
Appellate Moot Court Teams
The law school sponsors a number of appellate moot court teams each year. These teams have included:
- Jessup (International Law) Moot Court Competition
- First Amendment Moot Court Competition
- National Moot Court Competition
- Frederick Douglass Moot Court Competition
- Rendigs (Products Liability) Competition
- National Environmental Moot Court Competition
- Williams Institute (Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law) Moot Court Competition.
Each of these competitions requires writing an appellate brief and then traveling to the competition and engaging in a series of competitive oral arguments. Our teams have performed extremely well in these competitions, winning awards for best oral advocate and best brief as well as national championships.
Students interested in participating in an appellate moot court competition must enroll in a two-credit Appellate Moot Court class. Students in the class receive instruction in appellate brief writing and are required to complete two drafts of an appellate brief written with a teammate from the class. This brief is based on an actual problem from a prior moot competition. Students also receive intensive instruction and practice in appellate oral advocacy.
The class culminates with a moot court competition. The top competitors from the competition are named to the School of Law's Appellate Moot Court Board, which is responsible for selecting the members of the traveling teams from among its ranks. All participants who successfully complete the class requirements receive two academic credits, whether they are selected to the Appelate Moot Court Board or not.
The substantial benefits of this system include:
- Every student in the class has an opportunity to receive direction and feedback with regard to writing an appellate brief.
- Students also receive additional instruction, practice, and feedback in oral advocacy.
- Students who participate on moot court teams have the significant advantage of having written an appellate brief, having delivered multiple oral arguments, and having worked closely with a teammate, all of which are crucial to success in moot court competition.
This class is invaluable to all students, whether they compete on a moot court team or not.
Because of the way the moot court competitions are scheduled, students take the Appellate Moot Court Course in the fall semester. However, the students selected for the School of Law's Moot Court Board typically do not compete on a team until the next academic year, unless they participate in the Rendigs Products Liability Competition, or the Williams Institute Competition, which will take place entirely in the spring semester.
Therefore, all 2L students and 3L students who have any interest in brief writing opportunities, oral advocacy, and/or competing on an appellate moot court team are urged to register for the Appellate Moot Court Course. It is permissible to both participate in the Appellate Moot Court Course and try out for the trial teams or the negotiation teams.
Questions about the tutorial class may be directed to Professor Jeanne Kaiser or Professor Myra Orlen.
Questions about the individual moot court teams may be addressed to one of the appellate team faculty advisors:
Jessup International: Professor Charity and Professor Statchen
First Amendment: Professor Kaiser and Professor Orlen
National Moot Court: Professor Freeman and Professor Baldwin
Rendigs Products Liability: Professor Steiner
Williams Institute: Professor Flynn
National Environmental Moot Court: Professor Steiner
Negotiation Intramural Competition
Selected students participate in the ABA Negotiation Competition which simulates legal negotiations in which law students, acting as lawyers, negotiate a series of legal and factual problems against another team of students. The simulations consist of a common set of facts known by all participants and confidential information known only to the participants representing a particular side. All of the simulations deal with the same general area of the law, but the negotiation situation varies with each round and level of the competition.For more information, please contact:
Professor Reich-Graefe, Room 201, at email@example.com or 413-782-1451.
Transactional Law Meet
The National Transactional Law Meet is the premier “moot court” experience for students interested in a transactional practice. The National Transactional LawMeet is a part of the LawMeet family of live, interactive, educational competitions designed to give law students a hands-on experience in developing and honing transactional lawyering skills.
Selected students participate in the Transactional Lawyering Meet where students work to draft a transactional agreement and to negotiate its provisions with opposing student teams. Student competitors combine lawyering skills, drafting, knowledge of contract, corporate and other facets of business law and business sense to develop innovative solutions for structuring the transaction.
For more information, please contact:
Professor Eric Gouvin at firstname.lastname@example.org or 413-782-1413
ABA Tax Challenge
An alternative to traditional moot court competitions, the Law Student ABA Tax Challenge asks two-person teams of students to solve a cutting-edge and complex business problem that might arise in everyday tax practice. Students interested in enrolling in the ABA Tax Challenge are required to enroll concurrently in the Federal Income Tax Simulation course.
For more iformation, please conact:
Professor Fred Royal at email@example.com or 413-782-1422.